How to measure and monitor the results of your business strategy
Business strategies are successful when there is a direct correlation between marketing and sales, and financial performance. The success of a strategic plan can be assessed by monitoring a range of key performance indicators (KPIs).
However, it is important to bear in mind that:
- these KPIs measure the level of achievement of the goals defined in step two of building the strategy.
- these KPIs should be defined before the implementation of the strategy takes place to ensure correct measuring.
Normally, most of the key performance indicators below are measured when implementing a new business strategy:
Growth:
- Sales revenue;
- Number of customers;
- Customer retention rate;
- Customer recurrence rate;
- Conversion rate;
- Average order value (AOV);
- Business volume;
- Competitive position.
Market share:
- Market position;
- Sales profit rate;
- Brand awareness and media coverage;
- Company margin relative to the industry average;
- Sales increase compared to the industry average.
Financial performance:
- High profit;
- Net income;
- Operational profit;
- EBIT and EBITDA;
- Return on assets;
- Free cash flow;
- Operating cash flow.
In practice, companies can measure the success of the strategy more granularly. This is because individual departments define their own strategies based on their own function.
Examples of successful business strategies
Amazon
Amazon is known for its excellent customer service and fast delivery options. Because its vision is to be the most customer-oriented company in the world, Amazon is making it a reality by constantly improving customer experience in existing and emerging markets. The outcome? Additional growth and higher value for shareholders.
In his first shareholder letter in 1997, Jeff Bezos himself outlined the four principles that guide the company:
- the obsession with serving customers, rather than focusing on competitors;
- the passion for innovation;
- the commitment to operational excellence;
- long-term thinking.
Amazon’s generic strategy is to gain a competitive advantage by reducing costs (cost-based strategy), combined with its ability to innovate in competitive markets. The emphasis is always the same: meeting the needs of end customers.
This allows Amazon to outperform its competition, which often struggles to catch up with the giant. Its micro strategies (operational, marketing, etc.) follow the macro strategy of focusing on a varied offer, price, and volume to create value for customers. This strategic framework has allowed Amazon to become one of the most successful companies of the 21st century.
PayPal
There are certain industries that you simply don’t mess with, industries such as aeronautics, supermarkets, and banking. In fact, the banking sector is probably the least susceptible to disruption. It takes a lot of capital, a lot of approvals and regulations, not to mention years of building customers’ trust to lend you their most important asset – their money.
Banks are old. Their business models are largely unchanged for hundreds of years and they make huge profits without actually doing a single thing. They are extremely strong and almost impossible to disrupt. But for some crazy reason PayPal – a name that now makes any bank shiver – didn’t seem to care.
Here’s why:
- PayPal spends less on technology than a medium-sized bank. However, its technology platform is far superior.
- Consumers trust PayPal as much, if not more, than they trust their bank. Even though PayPal has only been on the market for a short while.
- When customers make a purchase using their PayPal account, the bank has no idea what the customer actually bought. The transaction appears on the bank statement as “PayPal” only. This gives PayPal complete control when it comes to data mining.
- PayPal is fast.
- PayPal refuses to partner directly with banks – it partners directly with merchants instead.
In a short time, PayPal has managed to establish itself as a completely new payment method on the Internet (and even offline) – offering a reliable alternative. Let’s take a look at why PayPal has had one of the best business strategies ever.
What can we learn from PayPal?
The story of PayPal’s success is based on two huge pillars. The first is simple – by sheer luck, they accidentally became the preferred payment provider for eBay transactions. This was followed a few years later by their $ 1.5 billion acquisition by eBay. eBay was smart enough to leave them alone, and thanks to their courage, they were able to conclude a series of deals with other online merchants to try to replicate their success with eBay.
Here comes the second pillar of their success. Partnerships. Banks have always been concerned about forming direct partnerships with small retailers – instead, they have relied on their corporate partners (Visa / MasterCard) to do this job. They did not want to worry about managing many different contracts and were extremely confident that credit and debit cards would always be at the heart of the payment system. But the problem was that MasterCard itself was already working on a partnership with PayPal. Leaving the benches on the outside.
Today, PayPal has a staggering 54% share of the payment processing market. Almost all of this growth came from their direct relationships with large and small traders.
Toyota
Modesty can be the best business strategy.
In 1973, the so-called “Big Three” automakers in the United States (General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, Ford Motor Company) had more than 82% of the domestic market share. Today they have less than 50%. The main reason is the aggressive (and unexpected) entry of Toyota-led Japanese carmakers into the U.S. market. That was in the 1970s.
Cars are big, heavy and expensive to transport. This is one of the reasons why the American market was so surprised when Toyota started selling cars made in Japan in the USA market, at prices too low to compete. The auto industry had made a huge contribution to the US economy, so one of the first reactions from the government was to introduce protectionist taxes on all car imports – making Japanese cars as expensive as locally made cars. But the tactic failed.
In a few years, Toyota (and others, by now) has been able to set up production plants in the United States, eliminating the constraint to pay import taxes. At first, American carmakers were not very worried. Certainly, with production moving to the United States, production costs for Japanese automakers should have increased to about the same level as those of local automakers. But this did not happen. Toyota continued to produce cars (now made in the United States) for much cheaper than American companies.
Toyota’s fine-tuned production processes were so efficient that they managed to beat US carmakers to their own game. You’ve probably heard of the notion of “continuous improvement.” In the world of production, Toyota is the exact grandfather of this.
What can we learn from Toyota?
Most of the business success stories you’ve read – especially in the Western world – involve bold moves and stories of competing against all odds. What makes this special story so unique.
The fact is Toyota spent years studying the production lines of American automakers, such as Ford, because they knew that the American automobile industry was more advanced and efficient than the Japanese. So they took their time and used it. They studied their competitors and tried to copy what the Americans did so well. They mixed those processes with their strengths and came up with something even better.
Toyota showed that knowing your own weaknesses can be the key to success – becoming one of the best business strategies you can ever implement.
And there was something else. Could you name just one famous Toyota executive? No. And one of the reasons is that Toyota’s number one value is modesty. This value that helped them dominate the US market is deeply rooted in the organization, top-down, from executives to simple workers.